500 benchmark records from 2026-07-02
Hardware
CPU
AMD EPYC 9555P 64-Core Processor
X86_64, 48 physical cores, 48 logical CPUs
94 GB RAM
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
numpy 2.4.6 (conda)
scipy 1.17.1 (conda)
pandas 2.3.3 (conda)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (48 threads)
- libgomp (48 threads)
sklearn-torch-cpu
Python 3.12.13
Array API active
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
torch 2.10.0+cpu (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (48 threads)
- libgomp (48 threads)
sklearnex-cpu
Python 3.12.13
Packages
scikit-learn 1.8.0 (conda)
scikit_learn_intelex 2026.1.0 (pip)
daal 2026.1.0 (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (48 threads)
- libgomp (48 threads)
linear / fit (36 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🔁
Number of iteration differs: this might mean algorithms differ - LogisticRegression (4)
linear / predict (36 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🔁
Number of iteration differs: this might mean algorithms differ - LogisticRegression (4)
tree-based / fit (120 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🧺
Scikit-learn intelex uses binning & histogram-based splits while scikit-learn doesn't - ExtraTreesClassifier (15), ExtraTreesRegressor (15), RandomForestClassifier (15), RandomForestRegressor (15)
◇
Metrics differ from the baseline (46 points)
tree-based / predict (120 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🧺
Scikit-learn intelex uses binning & histogram-based splits while scikit-learn doesn't - ExtraTreesClassifier (15), ExtraTreesRegressor (15), RandomForestClassifier (15), RandomForestRegressor (15)
clustering / fit (3 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
clustering / predict (3 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
548 benchmark records from 2026-07-02
Hardware
CPU
AMD EPYC 7413 24-Core Processor
X86_64, 8 physical cores, 8 logical CPUs
47 GB RAM
GPU(s)
cuda:0: NVIDIA L4 (22 GB)
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
numpy 2.4.6 (conda)
scipy 1.17.1 (conda)
pandas 2.3.3 (conda)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (8 threads)
- libgomp (8 threads)
sklearn-cupy-cuda
Python 3.12.13
Array API active
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
cupy 14.1.1 (conda)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (8 threads)
- libgomp (8 threads)
sklearn-torch-cpu
Python 3.12.13
Array API active
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
torch 2.10.0+cpu (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (8 threads)
- libgomp (8 threads)
sklearn-torch-cuda
Python 3.12.13
Array API active
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
torch 2.10.0+cu129 (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (8 threads)
- libgomp (8 threads)
sklearnex-cpu
Python 3.12.13
Packages
scikit-learn 1.8.0 (conda)
scikit_learn_intelex 2026.1.0 (pip)
daal 2026.1.0 (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (8 threads)
- libgomp (8 threads)
linear / fit (60 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🔁
Number of iteration differs: this might mean algorithms differ - LogisticRegression (4)
linear / predict (60 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🔁
Number of iteration differs: this might mean algorithms differ - LogisticRegression (4)
tree-based / fit (120 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🧺
Scikit-learn intelex uses binning & histogram-based splits while scikit-learn doesn't - ExtraTreesClassifier (15), ExtraTreesRegressor (15), RandomForestClassifier (15), RandomForestRegressor (15)
◇
Metrics differ from the baseline (46 points)
tree-based / predict (120 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🧺
Scikit-learn intelex uses binning & histogram-based splits while scikit-learn doesn't - ExtraTreesClassifier (15), ExtraTreesRegressor (15), RandomForestClassifier (15), RandomForestRegressor (15)
clustering / fit (3 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
clustering / predict (3 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
592 benchmark records from 2026-07-02
Hardware
CPU
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra X7 358H
X86_64, 16 physical cores, 16 logical CPUs
31 GB RAM
GPU(s)
level_zero:gpu:0: Intel(R) Arc(TM) B390 GPU (29 GB)
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
numpy 2.4.6 (conda)
scipy 1.17.1 (conda)
pandas 2.3.3 (conda)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (16 threads)
- libgomp (16 threads)
sklearn-dpnp-gpu
Python 3.12.13
Array API active
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
dpnp 0.19.1 (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (16 threads)
- libgomp (16 threads)
sklearn-torch-cpu
Python 3.12.13
Array API active
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
torch 2.10.0+cpu (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (16 threads)
- libgomp (16 threads)
sklearn-torch-xpu
Python 3.12.13
Array API active
Packages
scikit-learn 1.9.0 (conda)
torch 2.12.1+xpu (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (16 threads)
- libgomp (16 threads)
sklearnex-cpu
Python 3.12.13
Packages
scikit-learn 1.8.0 (conda)
scikit_learn_intelex 2026.1.0 (pip)
daal 2026.1.0 (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (16 threads)
- libgomp (16 threads)
sklearnex-gpu
Python 3.12.13
Packages
scikit-learn 1.8.0 (conda)
scikit_learn_intelex 2026.1.0 (pip)
scikit_learn_intelex_gpu 2026.1.0 (pip)
dpnp 0.20.0 (pip)
daal 2026.1.0 (pip)
Threadpools
- libopenblas 0.3.33 (16 threads)
- libgomp (16 threads)
linear / fit (82 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🔁
Number iteration of iteration not reported for this variant - LogisticRegression (4)
-
↩
Some operations fell back to CPU according to benchmark logs - Ridge (4), RidgeClassifier (4)
-
🔁
Number of iteration differs: this might mean algorithms differ - LogisticRegression (10)
linear / predict (82 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🔁
Number iteration of iteration not reported for this variant - LogisticRegression (4)
-
↩
Some operations fell back to CPU according to benchmark logs - Ridge (4), RidgeClassifier (4)
-
🔁
Number of iteration differs: this might mean algorithms differ - LogisticRegression (10)
tree-based / fit (120 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🧺
Scikit-learn intelex uses binning & histogram-based splits while scikit-learn doesn't - ExtraTreesClassifier (15), ExtraTreesRegressor (15), RandomForestClassifier (15), RandomForestRegressor (15)
◇
Metrics differ from the baseline (46 points)
tree-based / predict (120 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
■
Metrics match the baseline, but some comparison details are worth reporting:
-
🧺
Scikit-learn intelex uses binning & histogram-based splits while scikit-learn doesn't - ExtraTreesClassifier (15), ExtraTreesRegressor (15), RandomForestClassifier (15), RandomForestRegressor (15)
clustering / fit (3 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline
clustering / predict (3 points)
●
Metrics and benchmark setup match the baseline